🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.